✅ ✅ Yes, the content seems to be true and authentic, as reported by several sources.

These, include:

1. https://www.wiggin.co.uk/insight/online-safety-act-wikipedia-unsuccessful-at-the-high-court/ LINK - (Trust Score 7/10)

- Law firm Wiggin reports the High Court rejected Wikipedia's challenge to Online Safety Act regulations in August 2025, dismissing all grounds including human rights claims.

2. https://lawdit.co.uk/readingroom/wiki-failed-challenge-online-safety-act LINK - (Trust Score 6/10)

- Lawdit.co.uk details Wikipedia's failed High Court challenge on August 11, 2025, against categorization as a Category 1 service under the Act.

3. https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/09/12/wikimedia-foundation-challenges-uk-online-safety-act-regulations/ LINK - (Trust Score 9/10)

- Wikimedia Foundation's official update confirms the High Court dismissed their challenge on August 11, 2025, but notes potential future protections.

4. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wikimedia-Foundation-and-another-v-Secretary-of-State-for-Science-Innovation-and-Technology.pdf LINK - (Trust Score 10/10)

- Official UK High Court judgment PDF dismissing Wikimedia's judicial review of Online Safety Act thresholds.

5. https://www.courthousenews.com/wikipedia-loses-bid-to-shield-anonymous-contributors-from-uk-online-safety-law/ LINK - (Trust Score 8/10)

- Courthouse News reports the court dismissed Wikipedia's bid to protect anonymous contributors from the Act's user verification rules.