Enter any URL or topic, and let our advanced A.I. fact-check the content for you
✅ Yes, the content seems to be true and authentic, as reported by several sources.
These, include:
1. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/science-research-policy/2025/06/05/trump-policy-moves-make-grant-makers-political - (Trust Score 8/10)
- The article discusses how Trump's policy moves aim to make grant makers political appointees, which could compromise vital research.
2. https://www.statnews.com/2025/05/23/nih-research-threatened-trump-schedule-f-plan-reclassifies-scientists-as-political-appointees/ - (Trust Score 7/10)
- This source explains how Trump's 'Schedule F' plan risks politicizing NIH research by reclassifying career scientists as political appointees.
3. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/science-research-policy/2025/06/03/new-details-trumps-budget-cuts-alarm-researchers - (Trust Score 8/10)
- The article provides new details on Trump's budget cuts, including the proposal to make grant makers political appointees, which alarms researchers.