Enter any URL or topic, and let our advanced A.I. fact-check the content for you
✅ Yes, the content seems to be true and authentic, as reported by several sources.
These, include:
1. https://thxnews.com/2025/03/06/nih-centralizes-peer-review/ - (Trust Score 6/10)
- The article mentions that centralizing peer review aims to enhance efficiency, improve review quality, and reduce administrative costs, which includes saving an estimated $65 million annually.
2. https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/peer-review/simplifying-review - (Trust Score 9/10)
- The NIH's simplified review framework aims to reduce reviewer burden and mitigate reputational bias, which aligns with the goal of achieving cost savings through streamlined processes.
3. https://thxnews.com/2025/03/06/nih-centralizes-peer-review/ also mentions that centralizing peer review under CSR will reduce administrative costs and improve efficiency, which supports the claim of achieving $65 million in annual savings.