Enter any URL or topic, and let our advanced A.I. fact-check the content for you
✅ Yes, the content seems to be true and authentic, as reported by several sources.
These, include:
1. https://theprint.in/feature/around-town/congress-high-command-demanded-partition-not-jinnah-says-cambridge-historian/2527434/ - (Trust Score 8/10)
- The article from The Print quotes Anil Seal, a Cambridge historian, stating that the Congress high command demanded Partition, not Jinnah.
2. https://cpim.org/historical-debates-independence-and-partition-india/ - (Trust Score 7/10)
- This source from the CPI(M) website discusses historical debates on the independence and partition of India, including the argument that Congress leaders were in favor of Partition.
3. https://cpim.org/wp-content/uploads/old/marxist/20220102-marxist-sucheta-mahajan-partition.pdf - (Trust Score 8/10)
- The Marxist website provides a historical perspective on the partition of India, suggesting that Congress leaders' actions contributed to the division of the country.