Warning: The authenticity of this news could not be verified.
Iran is obligated under international agreements to allow nuclear inspections by the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to ensure its nuclear program remains peaceful. However, recent reports reveal that Iran has repeatedly lied, cheated, and concealed nuclear materials over many years, seriously undermining the transparency and trust essential for these inspections. Despite these violations, Western nations have largely refrained from taking decisive action. This troubling information was made public through a comprehensive IAEA report released two weeks ago, which clearly documents Iran’s continued non-compliance and nuclear secrecy.
The IAEA’s May 2025 quarterly report highlights multiple breaches by Iran of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), including Iran’s enhanced ability to produce weapon-grade uranium. The report also emphasizes that Iran’s nuclear weaponization activities are advancing stealthily, beyond the reach of inspectors. As a result, the IAEA’s capacity to effectively monitor Iran’s nuclear programs and detect the diversion of nuclear materials to undeclared sites has been significantly compromised. This ongoing lack of transparency fuels concerns about Iran’s true nuclear intentions and challenges the international community’s efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation.
In addition to these compliance issues, recent Israeli military attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities have further complicated the security situation, prompting the IAEA to maintain a vigilant presence in Iran despite difficulties. The IAEA Director General has stressed that attacks on peaceful nuclear sites violate international law and could result in dangerous radioactive releases, underscoring the fragile state of nuclear oversight in the region.
Overall, the revelations by the IAEA confirm Iran’s persistent evasion of nuclear regulations and highlight the urgent need for robust, enforceable measures to ensure Iran never acquires nuclear weapons, while holding Iran accountable for its actions. The West’s earlier inaction has allowed these issues to fester, raising serious concerns about regional and global security.
Our advanced AI algorithms browsed the web to verify the authenticity of "UK Divided: Keir Starmer and Domestic Critics Face Backlash Over Iran Crisis Stance". Below is an accurate report.
✅ No, we couldn't find enough information regarding this on authoritative news outlets. However, here's what we found:
1. Keir Starmer's Response to US Strikes on Iran:
- Sir Keir Starmer has called for restraint after Donald Trump launched US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. He acknowledged Iran’s nuclear program as a "grave threat" but advocated for de-escalation and a diplomatic process (Trust Score: 6/10).
- The Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary David Lammy sought to persuade Mr. Trump’s administration to hold off on joining Israel in striking Iran (Trust Score: 6/10).
2. Keir Starmer's Warning on Middle East Crisis:
- Sir Keir Starmer warned there is a risk of the Middle East crisis spiralling beyond the region after Donald Trump ordered an attack on Iran’s nuclear program. He spoke to the US President on Sunday night after the air raid (Trust Score: 5/10).
These sources do not support the claim of "deluded Iran-backing fascists" and instead reflect a more nuanced and diplomatic stance from Keir Starmer and the British government regarding the situation with Iran.
In 1998, Thom Tillis and his wife, Susan, along with their children, moved to North Carolina, settling in Cornelius, a town near Charlotte. This move marked a significant shift in Tillis's personal and professional life, as he soon became more involved in his local community. His entry into politics began around 2002 when he championed the establishment of a bike trail in Cornelius. This initiative demonstrated his commitment to enhancing local infrastructure and recreational opportunities for residents. As a result of his advocacy and community involvement, Tillis was invited to join Cornelius’s parks and recreation advisory board, giving him a formal role in local governance. This position allowed him to influence the development and maintenance of public spaces, further solidifying his reputation in the community. Building on this momentum, Tillis ran for office and in 2003 was elected to the town board of commissioners in Cornelius. His election marked the official start of his political career. During his time on the board, Tillis gained valuable experience in local government administration and public service, setting the stage for his future political ascent. His work at the local level paved the way for his later election to the North Carolina House of Representatives in 2006, where he served until 2015, eventually becoming Speaker of the House. Tillis's early political career was rooted in community engagement and a focus on improving quality of life through tangible local projects like bike trails and recreational facilities. This foundation underscored his broader political trajectory from local to state and eventually national politics.
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer has decisively ended speculation about a presidential run by stating, “I’m not going to run for president.” This declaration puts to rest ongoing rumors that positioned her as a potential leading contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. Despite widespread belief in political circles that Whitmer’s rising national profile and effective leadership could make her a strong candidate, she emphasized her focus remains elsewhere. Whitmer’s political journey has been marked by staunch advocacy for Michigan, notably securing federal commitments like the Brandon Road Interbasin Project to protect the Great Lakes economy. This recent achievement highlights her dedication to state issues and regional economic security rather than national ambitions. She acknowledged her passion for the country’s future, stating she cares deeply about where the nation is headed and the work needed to steer it on the right path. However, she noted that she does not feel the need to be “the main character” in that narrative, suggesting she may contribute in other capacities beyond a presidential bid. Although Whitmer cannot seek a third term as Michigan governor in 2026 due to term limits, her comments reveal a thoughtful stance on her political trajectory. She continues to engage actively in leadership roles but appears intent on focusing on impactful work outside of the presidential race for now. Her recent public statements and policy accomplishments reinforce her image as a committed governor prioritizing Michigan’s welfare over broader political speculation. <br /> <br /> This clarification from Whitmer ends rumors, providing a clearer picture of her current ambitions and reaffirming her dedication to serving Michigan and the country in ways beyond presidential politics.
Patricia Murphy is the senior political columnist for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC), having joined the paper's politics team in 2020. Before joining AJC, she was a nationally syndicated political columnist for CQ Roll Call. Murphy's extensive journalism career includes roles as Capitol Hill Bureau Chief for Politics Daily, a columnist for Newsweek/Daily Beast, and a contributor to The Washington Post and Garden & Gun. Her diverse background also includes working as a staffer for three U.S. senators, providing her with a deep understanding of political processes from both a journalistic and insider perspective. An Atlanta native, Murphy graduated from The Westminster Schools and Vanderbilt University, and earned a master’s degree in journalism from Columbia University. Since relocating from Washington, D.C., to Georgia, she has focused on covering local and national politics from a regional lens, emphasizing the sophistication and informed nature of Southern voters. Her reporting provided important insights during the Georgia runoff elections and has explored the dynamics shaping Georgia’s political landscape. Known for her thoughtful analysis, Murphy often highlights the humanity and dedication of public servants and the complexities of political life. She has addressed the polarization in American politics, urging a better understanding beyond partisan divides. Her work at AJC includes in-depth political columns that dissect state and national issues, candidate profiles, and the impact of policy decisions on communities. Murphy’s reporting continues to enrich public discourse with clarity and nuance, making her a respected voice in political journalism. <br /> <br /> Her career trajectory—from political staffer to top-tier political columnist—reflects her comprehensive expertise and commitment to informing the public about the intricacies of governance and electoral politics. Murphy remains an influential figure in political journalism, known for balancing insider knowledge with accessible storytelling.
David Wickert is an experienced journalist currently reporting for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, where he focuses on state budget, finance, and voting issues. He has been with the publication since 2010, bringing a deep understanding of governmental affairs and fiscal matters. Prior to his current role, Wickert covered local government and politics, specifically in Gwinnett and Fulton counties, two significant regions in the Atlanta metropolitan area. This background has equipped him with insight into the intricate workings of local and state politics, which he now applies to broader state-level coverage. Before joining the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, he gained valuable experience working at various newspapers across the United States, including in Illinois, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington. This diverse geographic and political reporting experience enriches his perspective and reporting style, allowing him to draw on a wide array of political and governmental contexts. His focus on finance and voting reflects a commitment to covering the core issues that directly affect citizens' daily lives and the functioning of state government. Wickert's career trajectory illustrates a steady evolution from covering local politics to tackling complex statewide issues, making his reporting a key resource for those interested in the fiscal policies, budget decisions, and electoral processes shaping Georgia. His work exemplifies a dedication to informing the public about the practical implications of government actions and political developments, ensuring transparency and accountability in public affairs. <br /> <br /> With his solid grounding in local politics and extensive reporting history across several states, David Wickert remains a prominent voice in political journalism in Georgia. His insights into the state budget and voting systems continue to contribute significantly to public discourse, helping readers understand how political decisions impact their communities.
The political dynasty in Kwara State has its roots in the era of the late Dr. Abubakar Olusola Saraki, a figure whose influence shaped the state's political landscape for nearly four decades. During a period when Kwara politics was still developing and lacked firm ideological grounding, Saraki leveraged his deep grassroots connections to build a formidable political base. After initially supporting Alhaji Adamu Atta, a minority ethnic candidate who became the first civilian governor of Kwara State in 1979, Saraki’s relationship with Atta soured, leading him to back Cornelius Olatunji Adebayo. This strategic move resulted in Adebayo’s election as governor in 1983, exemplifying Saraki’s political acumen and kingmaking ability. Saraki’s influence extended beyond electoral politics; he held prominent positions such as national vice-chairman and state chairman of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN), and he was also Senate Leader, which further solidified his authority. His role was crucial in controlling the political dynamics of Kwara State, where no significant political office was attained without his approval. His political image was also bolstered by his founding of Society Generale Bank, adding financial power to his influence. Known for a politics of inclusiveness, Saraki was deeply popular among his constituents, sharing their joys and struggles, which helped him maintain a strong hold over Kwara politics. Despite challenges and eventual decline in the dynasty’s dominance, the Saraki name remains a lasting symbol of political power in the state, marking a significant chapter in Kwara’s history that highlights both the strengths and vulnerabilities of political dynasties in evolving democratic contexts.<br /><br />The dynasty's fall, particularly evident after electoral defeats in recent years, reflects the electorate's desire for change from a past marked by cronyism and governance issues. Nonetheless, Saraki’s legacy as a political kingmaker and the architect of a decades-long dynasty remains deeply embedded in the state's political narrative.
The ongoing war between Israel and Iran marks a significant escalation in a decades-long conflict primarily centered on Iran's nuclear program. This program dates back to the 1950s with Iran's Tehran Research Reactor obtained under the U.S. “Atoms for Peace” initiative. However, the dynamics drastically shifted after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when the new Iranian regime labeled Israel as a major adversary and the nuclear program became shrouded in secrecy and suspicion. Tensions intensified notably in the early 2000s, when Iran’s covert Natanz nuclear enrichment facility was exposed, sparking international concerns over potential weapons development. Israel perceives Iran’s nuclear ambitions as an existential threat, prompting a history of covert operations targeting Iranian scientists and facilities. In June 2025, Israel launched a large-scale military strike in Tehran, targeting nuclear and military sites, including killing top Iranian military and nuclear scientists. This offensive, code-named Operation Rising Lion, aimed to severely damage Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, ballistic missile factories, and military capabilities amid fears that Iran was nearing nuclear weapons capability and reviving weaponization activities. The attack followed Israel’s exploitation of a strategic opportunity after weakening Iran’s regional proxies like Hezbollah and destroying Tehran’s air defenses in prior conflicts. The conflict rapidly escalated, causing over a thousand deaths in Iran and dozens in Israel before a ceasefire was declared after 12 days. This war has not only destabilized the Middle East but also intensified geopolitical tensions involving the United States, which supports Israel and has called for diplomacy while facing the challenge of curbing Iran’s nuclear progress without wider regional war. Understanding this conflict requires seeing it as part of a complex interplay of historical grievances, strategic calculations, and international diplomacy centered on Iran’s nuclear ambitions and Israel’s security imperatives.<br /> <br />