This news has been fact-checked
A recent UK government investigation revealed that nearly one in four eyelash serums sold in the UK contain prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) such as isopropyl cloprostenate. These chemicals, less studied than the well-known bimatoprost, have raised safety concerns due to reported side effects including skin darkening, dryness, and hollowing around the eye area. Notably, these adverse effects can occur after just a few weeks of product use.
These PGAs are synthetic compounds designed to mimic natural prostaglandins, substances in the body that can encourage eyelash growth by extending the lash follicles' growing phase. While bimatoprost, the most studied PGA, is approved for medical use in conditions like glaucoma, alternative PGAs like isopropyl cloprostenate have less scientific safety data.
The investigation's findings highlight that many consumers may be using lash serums containing pharmaceutical-mimicking ingredients without realizing their nature or risks. These products are regulated differently worldwide; for example, Sweden banned PGAs in lash serums in 2013 and Canada prohibits them altogether in cosmetics. In the US, the FDA has long stated that cosmetic products containing these ingredients and making growth claims should be classified as drugs rather than cosmetics.
Side effects reported in case studies include hyperpigmentation (skin darkening), irritation, eyelid dryness, and periorbital volume loss, which is a hollowing effect near the eyes. The latter has been linked to prostaglandin use in glaucoma drops and some lash serums as well.
Safer alternatives for lash care may include peptides or plant-based ingredients, though their effectiveness lacks robust scientific validation.
Consumers are advised to carefully check the ingredient lists of eyelash serums; any ingredient ending in “-prost” is a red flag for PGAs. Awareness of these risks is crucial to make informed choices about cosmetic products applied near sensitive eye areas.
Our advanced AI algorithms browsed the web to verify the authenticity of "Experts uncover overlooked health risks linked to lash serums". Below is an accurate report.
✅ Yes, the content about the hidden health side effects of lash serums appears to be true and authentic, as supported by several credible sources:
1. The Independent reports that lash serums containing bimatoprost, a prostaglandin analogue, can cause side effects like burning, redness, dryness, eye irritation, skin darkening on eyelids, fat loss creating a hollowed look around the eyes, permanent iris darkening, unwanted hair growth, and in rare cases, drooping of the upper eyelid requiring surgery. These side effects are documented and tend to resolve when the serum is stopped, but some can be permanent. The article also stresses these serums are prescription-only in the UK, highlighting the risks of over-the-counter use (Trust Score 7/10)
2. Healthline outlines that lash serums may improve eyelash length and thickness but can cause eye irritation, swelling, dry eye, and pigmentation changes on the eyelids. They emphasize stopping use and consulting a doctor if side effects occur. The article is based on peer-reviewed studies and clinical sources, affirming the safety concerns linked to prostaglandin analogues in lash serums (Trust Score 9/10)
https://www.healthline.com/health/do-lash-serums-work
3. Elle elaborates on less common but serious side effects such as muscle weakness around the eyes and periorbital fat loss from prostaglandin-containing serums. While these are rare, they showcase potentially severe consequences, stressing the importance of awareness (Trust Score 8/10)
These sources show authoritative consensus that while lash serums might be effective for enhancing eyelashes, they carry a risk of various ocular and cosmetic side effects, some potentially serious, especially with prostaglandin-derived ingredients.
Florida's governor, Ron DeSantis, is leading a government accountability initiative through the Florida Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE) team, which is conducting a sweeping audit of university research projects and budgets. This comprehensive review targets inefficiencies in public universities and colleges by demanding detailed records spanning six years on staffing, grants, and research activities. The DOGE team is explicitly tasked with identifying unnecessary spending and has even recommended the termination of certain research grants deemed non-essential or unproductive. The audit, initiated under DeSantis' executive order in February 2025, requires institutions to submit extensive documentation, including all grant applications and agreements, research drafts, and full staff accounting with job titles and salary details. This effort reflects a broader strategy to reduce government waste and align university programs with workforce and economic needs, moving away from what the administration views as ideological or nonessential academic pursuits, including diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Education Commissioner Manny Diaz Jr. supports this review, emphasizing a focus on courses providing foundational knowledge aligned with American principles and career readiness rather than programs perceived as lacking educational value. The DOGE team’s review parallels similar federal audits modeled after Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, which has curtailed billions in contracts and significantly cut federal staffing. Overall, the Florida DOGE initiative represents a rigorous attempt to streamline higher education spending and increase accountability, often recommending cuts to research grants and programs judged inefficient or ideologically driven, underlining Governor DeSantis’ commitment to fiscal conservatism and government efficiency across state entities. <br /> <br /> This audit comes amid ongoing political and cultural debates over curriculum content, with the state government aiming to eliminate "waste, bloat," and "campus fiefdoms" associated with diversity and equity, reflecting a broader ideological shift imposed by the administration. The university system’s Board of Governors collaborates closely with the DOGE team to flag programs considered superfluous or misaligned with state priorities, further influencing public higher education direction in Florida.
Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) are employer-offered health benefit accounts that allow employees to set aside pre-tax money for eligible healthcare expenses. For 2025, the annual contribution limit to an FSA is $3,300, up from $3,200 in 2024. These accounts are funded through payroll deductions and can cover a variety of medical costs such as copays, deductibles, prescriptions, and certain over-the-counter items. Employers may also contribute to an employee’s FSA. Additionally, unused FSA funds can be carried over to the next year, up to $660 for 2025, if the plan permits. Participation is optional but generally cannot be changed during the plan year without a qualifying life event like marriage or childbirth. FSAs can help reduce taxable income since contributions are exempt from federal income tax, Social Security tax, and Medicare tax. Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) have higher contribution limits than FSAs but require enrollment in a qualifying high-deductible health plan (HDHP). In 2025, HSA contribution limits can reach $4,400 for an individual or $8,750 for families, with an additional $1,000 allowed for people aged 55 and older. Unlike FSAs, HSA funds roll over year to year without limits and can be invested for future healthcare costs. Importantly, once a person enrolls in Medicare, they are no longer eligible to contribute to an HSA. This is a critical consideration for those approaching or on Medicare coverage, as they must stop HSA contributions but can still use existing HSA funds for qualified medical expenses. FSAs do not have this restriction but generally require active employment with an eligible employer to participate. This distinction between FSAs and HSAs is crucial for managing healthcare finances before and after Medicare eligibility.
A 30-year-old man named Patrick Joseph White attempted to enter the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) headquarters in Atlanta but was stopped by security guards. After failing to gain entry, he drove across the street to a nearby pharmacy, where he opened fire late on Friday afternoon. The shooting caused immediate chaos and fear, prompting lockdowns at both the CDC and the adjacent Emory University campus. White, who lived about 30 miles from the CDC in the Atlanta suburb of Kennesaw, is believed to have acted with a motive related to his anti-vaccine beliefs. Neighbors reported that White had expressed suspicion and anger toward COVID-19 vaccines, believing they had made him sick. The shooting resulted in multiple rounds being fired into the CDC buildings and inside the pharmacy where White was eventually found. Police discovered White on the second floor of the CVS pharmacy with a gunshot wound, and he was later pronounced dead. The incident led to heightened concerns among CDC employees, some of whom expressed feeling vulnerable and targeted during a Zoom call with agency leadership. At least 40 bullet holes were counted across several CDC buildings, underscoring the severity of the attack. Authorities continue to investigate the exact circumstances and motives behind the shooting. The event has raised alarms about the security of public health institutions and the potential dangers posed by individuals motivated by misinformation and distrust of vaccines, highlighting ongoing societal challenges related to public health and safety. <br /> <br /> The rapid response by security personnel at the CDC headquarters was critical in preventing the shooter from entering the facility. Nevertheless, the violence disrupted a sensitive government agency during a time when public health is a focus worldwide. The incident has sparked calls for increased protection measures and attention to the roots of such extremist actions.
Conditions such as anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder are widely recognized and frequently diagnosed mental health issues in the United States. However, borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a less common but significant mental health condition that impacts millions of people nationwide. BPD is characterized by pervasive difficulties in regulating emotions, leading to intense and prolonged emotional reactions that are hard for individuals to manage or stabilize after stressful events. People with BPD often experience patterns of unstable interpersonal relationships, impulsivity, and a distorted self-image. They may have frantic efforts to avoid abandonment, even when it is imagined, and show emotional instability marked by rapid mood swings, feelings of emptiness, and intense anger. These emotional challenges can also result in high-risk behaviors, including self-harm, suicidal threats, substance abuse, and reckless actions. Dissociative feelings and stress-related paranoid thoughts can also occur in more severe cases. The estimated prevalence of BPD in the U.S. varies, with studies suggesting that between 1.4% and 5.9% of the adult population may have the disorder. About 75% of diagnosed individuals are women, although recent research indicates men might be equally affected but often misdiagnosed with other conditions such as PTSD or depression. BPD frequently co-occurs with other psychiatric disorders like mood, substance use, or somatic symptom disorders. Although once considered untreatable, evidence-based therapies such as dialectical behavior therapy and mentalization-based therapy have shown significant effectiveness in managing BPD symptoms, offering hope for recovery and improved quality of life for those affected.<br /><br />BPD typically emerges in late adolescence or early adulthood and is associated with a history of genetic, environmental, and social risk factors, including childhood trauma or abandonment. Suicide risk is notably higher among individuals with BPD compared to the general population, emphasizing the importance of effective clinical intervention and safety planning.<br /><br />Despite its serious impact, BPD remains less well-known and is often stigmatized, highlighting the need for continued awareness, research, and access to specialized mental health care.
Rebecca Moore, Jeff Buckley's ex-girlfriend, has shared intimate details about the rock icon's final days before his tragic death at age 30. Buckley and Moore were close until his untimely passing in 1997, when he accidentally drowned in the Wolf River Harbor, a slack water channel of the Mississippi River in Memphis. Their relationship, which lasted until 1993, profoundly influenced Buckley's music, inspiring much of his acclaimed album Grace and prompting his move to New York. Moore remained one of the few people close to Buckley during his final years. On the night he died, Buckley had gone swimming fully clothed, singing a Led Zeppelin song, when he was swept away by the wake of a passing tugboat. Despite rescue attempts, his body was found days later, and an autopsy confirmed accidental drowning with no drugs or alcohol involved. Buckley’s death was neither mysterious nor suicidal but a heartbreaking accident, as emphasized by those close to him, including Moore. The documentary *It's Never Over, Jeff Buckley* further explores his relationships and complex life, featuring insights from Moore as well as other significant figures. It paints a portrait of an intensely talented but troubled artist whose deep connections with loved ones shaped both his work and ultimately his legacy. Moore’s reflections reveal a deeply human side to Buckley’s final days, blending sorrow, love, and the enduring impact of his art on those who loved him. <br /> <br /> Buckley's legacy continues through his music and the memories shared by those closest to him, highlighting a brilliant but fleeting life cut short too soon.
Dental experts generally recommend brushing your teeth **before breakfast** rather than after to protect your oral health. During sleep, bacteria multiply in the mouth, causing plaque buildup and "morning breath." Brushing first thing in the morning removes these harmful bacteria and forms a protective fluoride barrier on your tooth enamel. This barrier helps shield your teeth against acids from breakfast foods, many of which, like citrus fruits and coffee, are acidic and can temporarily weaken enamel.<br /> <br /> Brushing before eating also stimulates saliva production, which aids digestion and helps rinse away lingering bacteria after you eat. This increase in saliva can last several minutes and provides a natural defense for your oral cavity.<br /> <br /> Conversely, brushing immediately after breakfast poses risks because the acids and food particles in your mouth soften enamel temporarily. Brushing while enamel is in this vulnerable state can cause wear and damage to your teeth. Dental experts advise waiting at least 30 to 60 minutes after consuming acidic foods or drinks to allow your enamel to re-harden before brushing. If you prefer brushing after breakfast, it’s best to delay it accordingly or rinse your mouth with water or chew sugar-free gum first to reduce acid levels.<br /> <br /> Overall, brushing teeth *before* breakfast is often considered the wiser routine to maximize enamel protection and improve oral hygiene, while brushing right after eating requires careful timing to avoid damaging your teeth.<br /> <br />